Mark Sexton, a retired police constable from Birmingham UK, speaking on Friday, 2 February 2024, made an important video on the contract that Pfizer signed with the South African Government in relation to the Covid-19 vaccines. The South African Supreme Court ordered the South African Government to release the contract for the public to scrutinize.
Sexton said the contract concerned him, saying, “If the UK signed the same as, or very similar as this, we’re in trouble and I’ll tell you why.”
Mark Sexton Talks About Contract Between Pfizer And Governments
What concerns Sexton are a number of things: First of all, on Page 7, Section 1.56 “Vaccine”:
“Vaccine” shall include (a) all vaccines manufactured, in whole or in part, or supplied, directly or indirectly, by or on behalf of Pfizer or BioNTech or any of their Affiliates that are intended for the prevention of the human disease COVID-19 or any other human disease, in each case which is caused by any of the virus SARS-CoV-2, and/or any or all related strains, mutations, modifications or derivatives of the foregoing that are procured by Purchaser, its Affiliates or agents by any means (whether pursuant to the Agreement or by way of any purchase or donation from any third party or otherwise, whether or not authorized pursuant to Section 2.1) or that are administered within the Territory, and whether procured or administered prior to or following execution of this Agreement, (b) any device, technology, or product used in the administration of or to enhance the use or effect of, such vaccine, (c) any component or constituent material of (a) or (b), or (d) any use or application of any product referred to in (a)-(b).
Sexton points out that the vaccines are intended for the prevention of [Covid-sic], but they aren’t preventing it are they?
“The word ‘prevention’ in the dictionary is very specific: Prevention is the act of stopping something from happening.”
“But we know now, and have known for a long time, they are not preventing SARS-Cov2, Covid-19, or any of the mutations. So, that is false information.”
Maybe at the time they thought so; he said, but to Sexton those vaccines are not doing what they said on the tin. He added, “Naughty, naughty, Pfizer.”
Second, Sexton draws our attention to Page 21, Section 5.5, entitled “Purchaser Acknowledgement”:
5.5 Purchaser Acknowledgement.
Purchaser acknowledges that the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine, and their components and constituent materials are being rapidly developed due to the emergency circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to be studied after provision of the Vaccine to Purchaser under this Agreement. Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known. Further, to the extent applicable, Purchaser acknowledges that the Product shall not be serialized.
He points out that they’re saying to the S.A. Government quite clearly – “the LONG-TERM EFFECTS and EFFICACY of the Vaccine are not currently known”.
“What does ‘efficacy’ mean from the dictionary? Efficacy is the ability of something to produce the intended results.”
Concerning the long-term effects and efficacy, Sexton wants everyone to understand “They’re saying, ‘We don’t know’.”
Bringing his discussion to the UK’s own claims, Sexton points out that “our own government, our own media, superstars, sports-stars, influencers, GPs, and more said, “Oh, it’s 95% – 100% effective, safe and effective.”
These claims also occurred in Gibraltar:
Government of Gibraltar: Arrival of COVID-19 Vaccine in Gibraltar – 30/2021 JANUARY 09, 2021 – “Studies show that up to 95% of people who are fully vaccinated with the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine develop an immune response.”
Public Health Gibraltar: “Covid Vaccine – Questions and Answers” – (December 15, 2020) – “The Pfizer vaccine cuts cases of Covid by about 95%.”
Gibraltar Chronicle: Pfizer vaccine is 95% effective and works in older people, new data shows
It is also worth pointing out that Karen Kingston, a medical-legal advisor and biotech analyst, explained the 95% Effective Lie in layman’s terms: “What Pfizer’s 95% effective claim really means in layman’s terms is Pfizer statistically proved that you could be 95% confident that you would have less than a 1% chance of developing COVID-19 symptoms confirmed by a positive PCR-test for up to two months, whether you were injected with Pfizer’s mRNA or did nothing.” – Should your Loved Ones Know About the Data Behind Pfizer’s ‘Safe & Effective Vaccine’.
Third, Mark Sexton then brings our attention to what is written on Page 36:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first written above.
He notes that on the 1st of April 2021 the agreement between Pfizer and the S.A. Government became binding.
Sexton again “brings it home” to the UK:
“Let’s assume our government – we have to assume this – we rolled out the vaccines on the 8th of December 2020, yet 4-5 months after the rollout, Pfizer’s contract with the S.A. Government is saying they don’t know the efficacy. They don’t know the long term effects – so that means our government would have known this information 100 percent. This is a contract – so our government’s lawyers would have read that – if it’s similar, or the same as the S.A. Government one [and I’m taking that at face value right now] means our government knew – our lawyers who work for us, for the government – they knew. They would have read this contract.”
“This contract is 99.9% favourable to Pfizer. They’ve got no liability. They’ve got indemnity against anybody being sued. No third party can sue them. It’s all in these different sections in this contract:
- Page 23 Section 8.1 – Total indemnifaction of Pfizer and BioNTech;
- Page 25 Section 9.1 – Insurance. They will not not cover any third party claims;
- Page 26 Section 9.6 – Excluded Liability. The governments knew exactly what they were signing and exactly what they were doing.”
He reads a portion of the Indemnification Clause:
Indemnification by Purchaser.
8.1 Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer, BioNTech, each of their Affiliates, contractors, sub-contractors, licensors, licensees, sub-licensees, distributors, contract manufacturers, services providers, clinical trial researchers, third parties to whom Pfizer or BioNTech or any of their respective Affiliates may directly or indirectly owe an indemnity based on the research, development, manufacture, distribution, commercialization or use of the Vaccine, and each of the officers, directors, employees and other agents and representatives, and the respective predecessors, successors and assigns of any of the foregoing (“Indernnitees”), from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements,
“So why did our government sign a contract – an agreement – where they knew something had long-term effects but they didn’t know what they were? Where they knew it wasn’t effective? Yet, they were going on television every single day – Boris, Whitty, Vallance, Van-Tam, Sajid Javid. They were going on television, saying it was “safe and effective”. They blantantly lied to the British people day, after day, after day. Let’s not forget vaccine minister Nadhim Zahawi. So, all these people working for us in the government, in the civil service, knew [if the contract was the same] that it wasn’t effective. They didn’t know if it was safe or not; and they gave it to the British people in the millions; and they spent billions [of OUR money – ed.] buying this product from Pfizer.”
[Mark Sexton and others also filed a claim against Boris, Whitty, Javid and others to the International Court of Justice in December 2021.]Has Pfizer committed fraud, asked Sexton, because the vaccine is not preventing Covid – It would appear to be causing it, he added.
It is also worth noting that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sued Pfizer, Inc., for unlawfully misrepresenting the effectiveness of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine and attempting to censor public discussion of the product. Pfizer engaged in false, deceptive, and misleading acts and practices by making unsupported claims regarding the company’s COVID-19 vaccine in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The pharmaceutical company’s widespread representation that its vaccine possessed 95% efficacy against infection was highly misleading. – Texas takes Pfizer to court over Covid-19 shot
Mark Sexton asks, “How do we go about rectifying what these people have done – these heinous and disgusting crimes – our government, our civil service, our media have committed against the people? We’ve got millions of people injured; hundreds of thousands of people dead and excess deaths are through the roof.”
He then brings up Andrew Bridgen asking Rishi Sunak in Parliament if he had promoted anything as safe and effective:
“And what was Rishi Sunak’s reply?” asked Sexton.
Sunak: Covid vaccines are safe. They are safe.
“Really interesting (that) Rishi Sunak didn’t say ‘safe and effective’, which has been the mantra they’ve (stated) for the last three years. So, Rishi Sunak, why didn’t you say ‘effective’?”
Sexton wondered if it was because Sunak looked at the contract and realized; or that Sunak was aware of the harming and deaths being caused.
[Read also: Rishi Sunak Made $710 Million From a Secret Vaccine Deal Made Just Months Before the Pandemic Started] [Read also: Andrew Brigden’s “Pandemic” Hearing in the UK Parliament where experts were invited to give testimony.]Call To Action:
“To all the lawyers out there, the barristers out there, the legal superstars out there – you need to get a copy of this contract and you need to sue the British government, and the civil service, and potentially Pfizer – because as part of Pfizer’s agreement, it says that this agreement is non-binding if fraud is being committed or misrepresentation.”
“I think Pfizer has committed fraud and misrepresentation, because [the vaccine] doesn’t prevent what (it) was supposed to prevent; but our government knew that. Regardless of what Pfizer has or hasn’t done, our government and their lawyers KNEW THIS PRODUCT WAS NOT EFFECTIVE and they didn’t know what the long-term effects were. Yet, they are spouting over the television day after day, in the media, 24/7, indocrinating the public, that [the vaccines] are safe and effective. How do they know when Pfizer is telling them it isn’t?”
“Metropolitian Police, are you finally going to do something now?”
Sexton said we’ve got evidence, and the police need to get the contract from the government, that they should be saying, “We’d like to see the contract please”.
“It’s our contract. Make it public.”
“Get it down to the police station, have a look at it, and start making the arrests of these people who have caused these disgusting crimes to the men, women and children of the United Kingdom.”
He also suggested that people around the world get the contracts their governments have signed on their behalves and look to see if the contracts state the same as the S.A. contract. Because if they do, they should be asking questions.
“There needs to be accountability. You’ve murdered, murdered, our families. Corporate manslaughter, gross negligent manslaughter, misconduct in public office, misfeasance in public office, manslaughter, fraud, genocide, treason, crimes against humanity – they are all there.”
“And let’s not forget terrorism. We were terrorized, look what they did to the elderly. They injected them to death as well. There’s blood on these people’s hands.”
Again Sexton stated, “There needs to be accountability.”
“It’s time that the people of this country stood up and said, ‘What on earth is going on?’ There has to be – has to be – a criminal investigation. Metropolitan Police, do your job! We’ve had enough. How much more evidence do you need? How much more?”
This isn’t the first message to the Met Police from Mark Sexton. He wrote an open letter January 2022; and another letter in June 2022 demanding action. And in June 2023, he submitted a judicial review application to the High court against The Metropolitan Police. See the court document as a PDF and watch Mark Sexton, Philip Hyland and Hannah Rose give details about the application.
Mark Sexton encouraged viewers to find the contract and look for themselves at the points he raised.
Here is a PDF of the S.A.-Pfizer Contract – Manufacturing and Supply Agreement between Pfizer and the Government of South Africa
“Go look and see what these so-called government ministers have done to us for the last four years with the knowledge, the knowledge, [the vaccines] don’t work. They’re not effective, and they knew from the start.”
It is time for a criminal investigation and accountability.
“But most importantly, [it’s time for] remedy and redress – for the many, many victims of these disgusting (bio)weapons they call vaccines. Thank you.”
To “bring it home” to Gibraltar:
The Government of Gibraltar signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the UKGOV Department of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS), which represented the UKGOV in its contract with Pfizer. Terms and Conditions of the supply was also obtained.
Chief Minister Fabian Picardo’s response to questions about liability seem to be in line with BEIS taking full responsibility as long as Gibraltar follows the contract exactly.
Please review the carefully crafted BEIS/DHSC – COVID-19 Indemnities.
Excerpts from COVID-19 Indemnities – 08 December 2020 – BEIS/DHSC:
Given the exceptional circumstances we are in, and the terms on which developers are willing to supply a COVID-19 vaccine, we have had to take a broader approach to indemnification than we usually would. Global approaches differ, but we are aware that many other nation states are offering indemnities as part of their contractual arrangements, or other means e.g., the US PREP Act, which provides immunity from liability to vaccine developers…
We are providing indemnities in the very unexpected event of any adverse reactions that could not have been foreseen through the robust checks and procedures that have been put in place…
Treating detailed contractual information as commercially sensitive, and therefore confidential, will help to protect our negotiating position as we continue to enter into contracts with further vaccine developers as part of the national effort on COVID-19…
Even though we have accepted these indemnities at this point in time, there is likely still scope in the future to minimise the potential liability as we could potentially have multiple vaccines ultimately that could be deployed with differing risk profiles for contra-indications. Importantly, we only acquire a contingent liability at the point of deployment,…
It was also agreed that the [Vaccine Taskfore] VTF would procure vaccines on behalf of the entire United Kingdom including the Devolved Administrations. On this basis, the procurement contracts and associated indemnities will apply in the same way with any indemnities arising remaining outside of the Barnett Formula. This is consistent with other work on vaccines including the Vaccine Damage Payments Scheme. We also intend to supply Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies and provide indemnity in that regard.
Gibraltar was graced by experts in March 2023
Over 350 people attended this event on The Rock, yet it was not covered by local media or acknowleged by the government.
• Restora-tive Gibraltar Event makes its mark on The Rock – hosted by John Bowe, featuring Dr Aseem Malhotra, Dr Clare Craig, Steve Kirsch and others.
• Oracle Films Releases “RESTORA-TIVE: Safe and Effective? An Evening in Gibraltar” – “Evidence continues to come to light that what the Government of Gibraltar, Gibraltar Health Authority, politicians, doctors, nurses, police, and others pushed on the local population was a lie.”
• GBC & JABRALTAR – Lies & Censorship
Royal Gibraltar Police – “Do your job!”
Like Mark Sexton does for the UK, Tony Farrell is the voice crying in the wilderness for Gibraltar; and has called repeatedly for the RGP to take action.
• Intelligence Report on MISPRISION of TREASON
• Gibraltar Commissioner of Police Should Stop Acting and Start Arresting
• Policing The Corona State by Tony Farrell in Gibraltar – Christ demands that the RGP Commissioner and Governor Arrest and Prosecute the Perpetrators
• It Was Planned Out – A letter to the RGP Commissioner and 49 others
Instead of being Policy Enforcers who protect the rich, powerful and political elite, Police Officers need to act in the best interest of the people they are supposed to serve.
Focus on Additional Countries:
Leaked Document Reveals ‘Shocking’ Terms of Pfizer’s International Vaccine Agreements – The Albania agreement appears very similar to another contract, published online, between Pfizer and the Dominican Republic. It covers not only COVID-19 vaccines, but any product that enhances the use or effects of such vaccines.
The indemnity Clauses also caused concern in Brazil and India:
The indemnity clause in the leaked Pfizer contract with Brazil states “Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer, BioNTech, [and] each of their affiliates … from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses … caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the vaccine …”. Read more about the leaked Brazilian contract here, including the use of sovereign assets as collateral to guarantee indemnity.
In a first such public discussion, Dr. VK Paul, member of Niti Aayog, said Pfizer’s mRNA Covid-19 vaccine could not be brought to India as the pharmaceutical giant demanded indemnification and sovereign immunity waiver, while Moderna, too, insisted on indemnity clause. Indemnity would have meant no responsibility on the pharmaceutical giants in case of any mishap or adverse effects of their first-generation vaccine. Also, sovereign immunity waiver would give the firm the right to access national assets to make any pay-offs for damages.
The Covid-19 Vaccine Damage Bill
There is a Covid-19 Vaccine Damage Bill [Bill 45 2022-23] in the works. It is on its second reading. It is a bill to place a duty on the Secretary of State to make provision about financial assistance to persons who have suffered disablement following vaccination against Covid-19 and to the next of kin of persons who have died shortly after vaccination against Covid-19; to require the Secretary of State to report to Parliament on the merits of a no-fault compensation scheme to provide such financial assistance, on whether there should be any upper limit on the financial assistance available, on the criteria for eligibility and on whether payment should be made in all cases where there is no other reasonable cause for the death or disablement suffered; and for connected purposes.
DOING HARM:
It is also interesting to note this question and answer concerning injured claimants, from They Work For You:
Question from Christopher Chope: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many and what proportion of the claimants to the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme for disability caused by the Covid-19 vaccinations received their first vaccine in (a) January to March 2021, (b) April to June 2021 and (c) July to September 2021.
Answer from Maria Caulfield: As of 5 January 2024, of the 8778 COVID-19 related applications to the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme, 4658 applications or 53.06% related to a first vaccination received between January and March 2021; 2028 applications or 23.10% related to a first vaccination received between April and June 2021; and 516 applications or 5.88% related to a first vaccination received between July and September 2021.
The Florida Example:
• Florida State Surgeon General Calls for Halt in the Use of COVID-19 Mrna Vaccines
• Health Alert on mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Safety (Florida Health Department) – The State Surgeon General is notifying the health care sector and public of a substantial increase in Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports from Florida after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.
When you stand before your Maker on the coming Judgement Day, what will you be able to say – that you sat on the fence, kept your head in the sand, or feared the government? Will you say you were just following orders; or that you didn’t know? If so, prepare to hear “Depart from me, ye that work inequity.” (Matt. 7:21-23).
Indemnity might as well be inequity. Inequity refers to a lack of equity, which means “justice” or “fairness.” Where there’s inequity in a community, it means injustice, unfairness, and bias are being perpetuated.
All of the above can act as a guide on where to get started and how to proceed. But, if you are actually going to do nothing, then prepare for The Fire.