The oaths and ceremony not only have religious and ceremonial significance, but also constitutional importance – to govern by The Laws of The British.
Coronation Oath: Will Charles Liberate or Enslave The People? Read More »
Royal author Anthony Holden has correctly argued that Charles’ coronation should be invalid. How could a law-breaker ever be the top law-enforcer?
How Could Charles Be Coronated After His Divorce and Past Affair Read More »
An Open Letter to the Duke of Norfolk, the Earl Marshal, who is overseeing Charles’ coronation ceremony has been sent as a reminder of British Law.
Charles and The Great Retraction – The WEF Technocracy is Unconstitutional Read More »
Written by Tony, son of Joan – As thy church ways to crown a [corona]tion of Charles pertaining to the name of The Most High, you must do no such thing.
Archbishops of Canterbury and York, Giveth not a fig leaf to Charles Read More »
The pompous plan for the coronation of Charles The Pretender is futile. The Golden Orb committee should put their efforts in recognizing Christ as King.
The Golden Orb Committee Plans for the Wrong Coronation Read More »