by Peter
Dear Charles,
Are you going to follow in your mother’s footsteps and continue in the downright destruction of the British nation and Empire as she did during her fraudulent past 70 years pretend reign, now handed to you – fraudulently I might add – or will you take this opportunity handed to you by Christ in His second coming?
The Good news is that QE2 was never recognised by God, because the British people’s Patriot King was already here and had informed her as such – there is not doubt that you know this – but she chose to ignore Him, to her peril. As for Elizabeth, she may be remembered in the history books by True Israel (A people) that survives these times, as Elizabeth the Useless. She preferred for 70 years to be the fake QE2, a criminal and traitor while doing so, and will be remembered as such. Do you want to be remembered in the same way as your mother, Charles?
You should now remember that on 13/June/1988, 40 years from the Fig Tree putting forth its new shoots in 1948, Christ served a High Court Writ upon the British Parliament, at court in the City of Sheffield, where His new body had been born in 1948, as prophesied, demanding that he be acknowledged by Parliament as the Rightful British-Israel King.
Are you going to follow in your mother’s footsteps and continue to ignore Christ who is mercifully giving you another chance to do the right thing with His Decree and recognise His Authority and Jurisdiction over His British-Israel nation – which is NOT yours?
England has been transformed from a great and powerful nation – the classic home of civil liberty – into a sinister laughing-stock that teaches children in primary school that they can choose whether they want to be a boy, girl or neither – what the hell happened during your mother’s reign and are you going to fix this? The ultimate responsibility for where all this has gone wrong for Britain lies with your mother and her fraudulent 70 year misrule. Firstly, she never was Britain’s sovereign lady and she never defended the ancestral rights of her nation. It was her duty to resist without regard for the outcome – and it was in her power to resist without bringing on her head any of the penalties threatened or used against her supposed subjects. Unfortunately, she never did at any time in her mis-reign raise a finger in public, and probably neither in private, about any concern to the slow destruction of an order of things she swore in the name of God to protect. What are you going to do about this Charlie?
What are the true functions of the current English monarchy? The function of the True Monarchy is to express and to sustain the national identity according to The Law and all that stands with it. The Monarchy reminds us that the British nation is not some recent arrival in the world, and that the threads of continuity between the British people and their distant forebears Abraham, Isaac and Jacob have not been broken. The British Monarchy exists today, and five hundred years ago, and a thousand years ago, and two thousand years ago. And, as we go further back before king David and Saul, they vanish together, with no sense that they ever deviated their course according to Bible Prophecy.
Romans 11:7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the elect hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded
11:8 (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear;) unto this day.
(King of kings’ Bible)
Charlie are you also going to be discharged from your expressed function by hiding from the British people who they really are, and keep it hidden, that the British people are the literal descendants of the 12 Lost Tribes of Israel?
Some will think that by law (it is really fraudulent legislation), that you are the head of state; Supreme Governor of the Church of England (which is questionable) at best and Commander-in-Chief of all the armed forces. Will you continue to fraudulently appoint all the bishops and judges, and all the ministers and civil servants? Will you declare more wars, and will you continue to fraudulently sign treaties as your mother did? You can not make new laws by your own authority and impose taxes (it is really fraudulent legislation). To do either of those, you need the consent of Parliament. On the other hand, you can also veto any parliamentary bill you dislike – and your veto could not be overridden by any weighted majority vote of Parliament. These are the theoretical powers of an English Monarch. Except where limited by seventeenth century agreements like the Petition of Right and the Bill of Rights (these again being man-made and different from, and NOT allowed by The Real Royal LAW).
QE2 did not sustain Britain’s national identity. It is actually worse than this. By not expressing that True identity, she allowed many people to overlook the structures of absolute and unaccountable power that grew up during her reign. She fronted a revolution to dispossess the British people of their country and of their rights within it. How many of the people who turned out on that Jubilee Day, with their union flags and street-parties, will fully realise that the forms they were celebrating now contain an alien and utterly malign substance? Are you going to continue in your mothers footsteps Charlie boy?
Symbolic functions aside, the practical advantage of having a Royal Monarchy is that the head of state is chosen through the family line of Monarchs from King David and King Solomon of the Bible and Authorised by God and not by some corrupted system of election; and that such a head of state is likely to take a longer term, more proprietorial, interest in the country than someone who has lied his way into an opportunity to make five lifetimes of income in four years.
You are being given one last chance Charlie; by the True KING, Christ – will you take it or follow in the pernicious footsteps of your mama?
Yours sincerely,
Peter
This letter has been added to Crown Prince Michael in Gibraltar.