My Contempt of Parliament – v – Parliament’s Contempt of God
Democide On The Rock v Some Sort Of Warning
The totally corrupt Gibraltar Judiciary that is acting not only fraudulently, i.e. without Lawful authority, but also contrary to The Law, is protecting people who are indisputably guilty of capital crimes according to God’s Law – The Law, and crimes against humanity under the Nuremberg Code, whilst prosecuting me for exposing their criminality. Thus; turning justice completely on its head and making a total mockery of it; exposing the judiciary’s own corruption for all to see, if they have the eyes to see and are not being wilfully blind. And there are none so blind as those who refuse to see.
During the course of a pre-trial hearing on 21st May 2025, I was often left wondering whether Stipendiary Magistrate Charles Bonfante was making a blunder of the first magnitude, or was he playing a blinder to coin a phrase once used by the Chief Minister Fabian Pinocchio. Having previously declined to recuse himself, and having previously stopped both of my two cases from being heard by a jury of my peers, Mr. Bonfante further ruled and rode rough-shod over me in his refusal to view the contents of a documentary submitted as evidence for my defence. The documentary forms a core part of my defence strategy of URGENT NECESSITY, PUBLIC SAFETY, AND MORAL OBLIGATION. Muad’Dib produced the documentary for my case, and I narrated parts of it, and I even happily allowed myself to be filmed in parts of it, having been in full agreement with the film’s insightful contents, which are pivotal to my defence.
The documentary includes specially selected evidence from the following individuals:
(1) Dr. Tess Lawrie’s reading of Mistakes Were NOT Made: An Anthem for Justice
This is a powerful rendition of a poem by Margaret Anna Alice, which challenges the narrative that recent global events were simply errors or mismanagement. The poem asserts that these actions during the pandemic were deliberate and calculated, drawing parallels to historical genocides and calling for accountability. The reading was filmed by Mark Lawrie and shared through the World Council for Health, emphasizing the need for justice and transparency in governance and public health decisions.
(2) Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President of Pfizer
On 4th December 2023, Mike Yeadon addressed UK Members of Parliament and delivered a highly critical speech on the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine policies. He argued that there was no pandemic, no public health emergency, and no justification for experimental vaccines.
Claims of Fraud & Coercion – He accused governments and pharmaceutical companies of deliberate deception, stating that vaccine manufacturers knowingly produced a product designed to harm people.
Concerns Over Vaccine Composition – He argued that mRNA vaccines were designed to cause autoimmune reactions, blood clots, neurological defects, and infertility, citing the toxic spike protein and lipid nanoparticles as dangerous components.
Criticism of Pandemic Response – He challenged the use of fraudulent PCR tests, mass ventilation procedures, and sedative use in care homes, claiming they led to avoidable deaths.
Call to Action – He urged people to recognize the scale of the crime and take action to halt further vaccine distribution.
(3) John O’Looney an UK funeral director
John O’Looney has been outspoken about COVID-19 policies, vaccine safety, and government accountability. His efforts have focused on exposing what he claims are manipulated death statistics and coercive medical practices.
Key Aspects of His Advocacy:
Whistleblowing on COVID-19 Death Reporting – He has repeatedly stated that death numbers were artificially inflated, arguing that many fatalities were misattributed to COVID-19 to justify lockdowns and vaccine mandates.
Criticism of mRNA Vaccines – He has claimed that vaccines are causing excess deaths, particularly thrombosis-related fatalities, and has warned against continued mass vaccination programs.
Public Engagement & Activism – He has spoken at freedom rallies, collaborated with other activists, and continued to raise awareness through interviews and social media.
(4) Matthew LeTissier Sports Commentator and former Professional Footballer
Matthew LeTissier has been outspoken about the rise in sudden deaths among athletes, particularly in 2021 and 2022. He described the increase as “astronomical” and stated that he had never seen anything like it during his 17-year professional football career. He has also criticized the lack of investigation into these incidents, arguing that the surge in athlete collapses and fatalities needs urgent scrutiny. His stance has led to controversy and professional consequences, including losing his role as a TV sports commentator.
Key Aspects of His Advocacy:
Criticism of PCR Testing – He has claimed that PCR tests were the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on mankind, arguing that they were used to inflate case numbers artificially.
Concerns Over Vaccine Safety – He has expressed scepticism about mRNA vaccines, questioning their efficacy and long-term effects.
Public Engagement & Interviews – He has spoken at events and given interviews discussing COVID-19 restrictions, vaccine-mandates, and broader government policies.
Pushback Against Media Narratives – He has criticized mainstream media coverage, suggesting that certain pandemic-related images and reports were manipulated.
(5) Dr. Aseem Malhotra – top cardiac advisor to the UK Government, now working as advisor to the Director of the Dept. of HHS, Robert Fitzgerald Kennedy Jr. in the U.S.A.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra visited Gibraltar for an event titled “RESTORA-TIVE: Safe and Effective? An Evening in Gibraltar”, which took place on 30th March 2023. The event, hosted by John Bowe, featured Dr. Malhotra, Dr. Clare Craig, Steve Kirsch, and others, providing a platform for discussing COVID-19 policies, vaccine safety, and institutional accountability.
Key Themes from His Gibraltar Presentation:
Challenging Official Narratives – He argued that government and health authorities misled the public regarding vaccine safety and effectiveness. Public Engagement – The event allowed Gibraltarians to voice concerns about their experiences with COVID-19 measures, despite on-going peer pressure to conform. Call for Transparency – He urged both Chief Minister of the Government and Director of Public Health to stop the injections and acknowledge and investigate the risks associated with mRNA vaccines.
(6) Professor Angus Dalgleish – Internationally Renowned Emeritus Professor of Oncology
Angus Dalgleish, a professor emeritus of oncology at St George’s, University of London. His stance has been supported by figures like Jay Bhattacharya and John Ratcliffe.
Dalgleish has also been severely critical of Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci and mRNA vaccines, singling out Pfizer and questioning their safety and long-term effects. His views, including that this is Nuremberg Trial stuff have contributed to on-going debates about pandemic preparedness, vaccine policies, and government accountability.
(7) Jerry Bledsoe VA Nurse Interviewed by Stew Peters
Jerry Bledsoe is a registered nurse at the Fayetteville VA Medical Center in North Carolina. He appears on The Stew Peters show, and Jerry Bledsoe strongly opposed VA COVID-19 policies, arguing that compliance would make him complicit in medical tyranny. In his open letter, he stated that following the mandated protocols—including faulty PCR testing, withholding early treatment, and vaccine mandates—would amount to terrorism and coercion. He also referenced the Nuremberg Code, asserting that these policies violated fundamental medical ethics.
(8) Dr. David Martin
Dr. David E. Martin’s expertise lies in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance, particularly in tracking financial and technological developments. He is the Founder and Chairman of M·CAM Inc., a global leader in intellectual property-based financial engineering.
His background in patent analysis, corporate accountability and bioweapons has shaped his stance on vaccines and pandemic policies. He has argued that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered as a bioweapon and that vaccine manufacturers knew of its risks long before the pandemic. His investigations into patent records have led him to compellingly assert that coronavirus research was weaponized over decades. An Injection of Truth: Bioweapons and Their Creators.
(9) Professor Naomi Wolf and The Pfizer Papers
Professor Naomi Wolf has been deeply involved in analyzing Pfizer’s clinical trial documents, which were released under court order. Her work, compiled in The Pfizer Papers, argues that Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine trials were flawed and that the company knew by November 2020 that its vaccine was neither safe nor effective.
Key Findings from The Pfizer Papers:
Vaccine-Induced Harms – The reports detail adverse effects throughout the human body, including impacts on the reproductive system and multi-organ complications. Disproportionate Effects on Women – The analysis suggests that women suffer vaccine-related adverse events at a 3:1 ratio compared to men. Myocarditis Concerns – The book challenges the claim that vaccine-induced myocarditis is rare, mild, or transient, arguing that it is a serious and persistent issue. Elimination of the Control Group – Pfizer vaccinated 95% of placebo recipients by March 2021, making comparative safety determinations impossible. FDA’s Role – The book asserts that the FDA was aware of these issues, but failed to act, raising concerns about regulatory oversight.
(10) Dr. Peter Kotlar, a member of the ruling Slovak National Party
Slovakia has been making waves with its pushback against mRNA vaccines, particularly following a controversial report that questioned their safety. The report, led by Peter Kotlar, a member of the ruling Slovak National Party, recommended halting mRNA vaccinations until further safety evaluations were conducted. His claims – suggesting that mRNA vaccines alter human DNA– sparked significant debate and even contributed to the resignation of Health Minister Zuzana Dolinková. Prime Minister Robert Fico has publicly supported Kotlar’s stance, stating that he has always been against experimental COVID vaccines and has acquaintances who suffered health issues post-vaccination. He has also called for an investigation into who profited from Slovakia’s vaccine purchases.
(11) Anthony Farrell, Disciple of The Gibraltar Messenger
The documentary is narrated by Anthony Farrell, the defendant in these two cases and the author of this article. Farrell was formerly Principal Intelligence Analyst of South Yorkshire Police, who was fired from his job for speaking truth to power and refusing to peddle the government lies of former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair.
(12) Muad’Dib
Muad’Dib means Teacher of Righteousness in Arabic. Muad’Dib is the producer of several documentaries including the “7/7 Ripple Effect” series, “The NAZI Banksters’ Crimes Ripple Effect”, “The Hillsborough Ripple Effect”, and “The Windsors Ripple Effect” (All featured on JforJustice).
“Democide On The Rock” Preview:
GOD’S LAW
The documentary film also included a very short excerpt showing Charlton Heston playing Moses in Cecile B. DeMille’s epic production of The Ten Commandments. The clip incorporated into the documentary is where Moses shouts: “Those who will not live by THE LAW, shall die by THE LAW”, before launching the two tablets of stone on which God had written The Ten Commandments at the golden calf idol, which is somewhat symbolic of the modern day equivalent of Picardo’s sacred cows, and particularly the sacred cow he worships – his Pfizer Bioweapon mass-murdering injections, whilst having himself injected with a saline solution placebo, because he knew the Covid-19 bioweapon injections are harmful.
Magistrate Bonfante bemoaned the fact that the documentary film was three hours long, and in an act which smacked of wilful blindness, he refused point-blank to have it shown as evidence. Acting for myself, I protested, by relaying to him the following message.
“Magistrate Bonfante, I respectfully challenge this decision. The exclusion of this documentary raises serious concerns regarding transparency and full disclosure in court proceedings. This documentary presents real events, expert testimonies, and documented policies that directly impact this case. Excluding it limits the ability to fairly assess the broader context. A court record must reflect ALL evidence – even if not formally admitted. I request that its existence and relevance be recorded, preventing the authorities from pretending it does not exist.”
The Feeding of The Five Thousand
In the days leading up to the pre-trial hearing, in actions reminiscent of Jesus Feeding The Five Thousand, two thousand years ago, I distributed five thousand A5 leaflets to various households in Gibraltar, entitled “BEEN INJECTED? – You NEED To Read This”. They were all delivered before the pre-trial hearing.
The Feeding of The Four Thousand
Muad’Dib’s subsequent disgust with Bonfante’s willful blindness in what He plainly sees as the kangaroo courts of Gibraltar, spurred Him into the immediate post pre-trial production of a further double-sided A5 leaflet on my behalf, wherein now, as a follow-up to the feeding of the five thousand a couple of weeks ago, four thousand leaflets have now been fed to Gibraltar’s households. The sandwich board will also be redeployed. Without any hesitation, I will happily take all the necessary steps to help feed the four thousand, and promote the message in support of my own calling to be a Watchman on The Rock, and so, as a watchman with an obligation to happily deliver some sort of warning, to coin a phrase from Karen Ramagge Prescott, as cited by Detective Constable Denis Penalver from the Royal Gibraltar Police. Read the double-sided flyer, entitled “Gibraltar’s Corrupt Judiciary”.
Bonfante’s Directions
The Case of Contempt of Parliament has been scheduled for trial on 14th October 2025;
The Case of Improper Use of Electronic Storage Devices has been scheduled for trial on 16th October 2025, although I learned from attending court that this particular case, involving the three witches from the Gibraltar Health Authority, is pending a Crown Counsel Review and an iterim hearing has been set for 1st July 2025, where I expect to be given full disclosure from the prosecution, should the case proceed;
The Parliament in Contempt of God – Court Case
There doesn’t appear to be any publicly available records of ANY previous case in Gibraltar specifically dealing with the contempt of Parliament under section 77(c) of the unlawful Parliament Act 1950, before my activity on 13th December 2024 triggered a hasty and ill-thought through response by the criminal justice system. In other words no-one has ever been charged with this in Gibraltar before. It appears from this fact that this is a case of vindictive personal victimisation for speaking truth to power.
This is in stark contrast to a group of people being very rowdy, disrupting the Upper House of the UK Parliament with chanting, singing and throwing leaflets, who were escorted out by the UK police and no-one was charged with anything. In my case, it is now an established fact that not a single official complaint has been received from any parliamentarian present on the day, from either side of the house. Nor indeed has any complaint been received from The Speaker of Parliament herself.
Freedom of Expression & Institutional Hypocrisy in Gibraltar
“If you see something, say something.” That is the ethos of Project Servator, a principle ingrained in Royal Gibraltar Police culture to encourage citizens to report serious wrongdoing when they witness it. Chief Minister Fabian Picardo himself has publicly declared that the right to demonstrate is sacred, seemingly reaffirming Gibraltar’s commitment to freedom of expression.
FULL INTERVIEW: Fabian Picardo says the right to demonstrate is sacred
Yet, when these very principles were applied in practice – when detailed accusations of crimes against humanity were submitted with structured analysis, so-called “law enforcement took no meaningful action”. Instead, the response was an arrest for a minor disruption of parliament, exposing the hypocrisy within Gibraltar’s institutional framework.
If freedom of expression or speech means anything at all, it means the freedom to tell uncomfortable truths to people who do not want to hear them.
A Stark Contrast with Westminster *
The House of Lords in the United Kingdom has seen its fair share of disruptive protests. Just earlier this year, demonstrators shouted, sang, and threw leaflets, demanding reform of the unelected chamber. Yet, in Westminster, the approach was straightforward — remove the protestors, adjourn briefly, and resume proceedings. No criminal charges. No escalations.
In Gibraltar, however, the response was fundamentally different. Law enforcement took an extended period to determine the charge, initially offering a caution for disruption, which was declined as I had done nothing wrong. Then, in a legally uncertain move, authorities introduced the charge of contempt of parliament, a step that appears disproportionate when compared to other democratic systems, like the United Kingdom’s Mother of Parliaments.
The Absence of an Andrew Bridgen-Like Voice in Gibraltar
In the UK, Andrew Bridgen MP has been a leading voice in challenging pandemic measures, standing against institutional narratives and demanding accountability for excess deaths and vaccine safety concerns. His presence in Parliament has ensured that critical discussions take place, even when uncomfortable for those in power, who desperately don’t want them to be heard.
Yet, in Gibraltar, no comparable figure has emerged to challenge the silence on these deadly serious issues. The prolonged absence of an Andrew Bridgen-like politician made my intervention in Parliament all the more necessary, ensuring that Gibraltar’s institutions could not simply keep ignoring the gravity of the concerns raised, about the harm they themselves have caused.
The Test for Gibraltar’s Leadership
Chief Minister Fabian Picardo has publicly affirmed that the right to protest is sacred, reinforcing his government’s stance on democratic values and freedom of speech. Yet, the handling of this legal case presents a direct contradiction to that principle, proving him to be a vindictive liar.
This raises a fundamental question: Is Gibraltar’s democracy truly committed to protecting freedom of expression, or is it selectively applied to suppress dissent, and uncomfortable truths?
Conclusion: A Moment for Transparency & Accountability
The charge of contempt of parliament against a citizen who sought to raise concerns about crimes against humanity stands in direct contradiction to the spirit of that Opening Prayer. If Parliament truly seeks divine wisdom, then its decisions must conform to God’s Law and reflect moral courage, transparency, and accountability – not hypocrisy and suppression of dissent and truth.
This legal case is not just about one individual – it is a litmus test for Gibraltar’s governance. The contrast between Westminster’s handling of protests versus Gibraltar’s judicial response, the hypocrisy within Project Servator, and the absence of strong voices in Parliament all point to the necessity of a broader institutional reckoning.
According to video footage supplied of my arrest outside parliament, as taken from PC 219 Loosely’s body camera, evidence indicates that former judge Karen Ramagge Prescott happily suggested to DC Denis Panalver “some sort of warning”. In fairness to the speaker, it is not clear whether she was referring to what I had just tried to tell them, or what she viewed as an appropriate judicial action to take against me. If it was the latter, she is suffering from strong delusion, for she should be thanking me for my timely and necessary warning, highlighting the Democide on The Rock and the hypocrisy of the dishonourable politicians, falsely calling themselves honourable, in the aftermath of her Opening Prayer.
The charge of contempt of parliament against a citizen who sought to raise concerns about crimes against humanity stands in direct contradiction to the spirit of that prayer. If Parliament truly seeks divine wisdom, then its decisions must conform to God’s Law and reflect moral courage, transparency, and accountability – not hypocrisy and suppression of dissent and truth.
Meanwhile, the spineless, sheepish dishonourable politicians seemingly have left all the dirty-work for the Royal Gibraltar Police to do. And so it came to pass that their contempt of God in the parliament chamber had to be dealt with by three very likeable police officers, from the Royal Gibraltar Police PLC, who unwittingly or otherwise yet again arrested and processed the wrong person. Will they ever do the right thing, I wonder.
These three likeable officers are named as follows:
DC 66 Denis Penalver– The detective from Special Branch escorting me from the Parliamentary premises.
PC 219 Carrie Anne Loosely – the police officer arresting me outside parliament.
PC 336 Colin Hodgson – the police officer interviewing me in police custody.
Full prosecution disclosure for this particular case has now taken place and I have now had the opportunity to review all the prosecution material on offer. With respect to the arrest outside parliament, the arresting officer PC 219 Carrie Anne Loosely later offered me a caution on 22nd January 2025, owing to the fact that she said that I have no previous criminal convictions. As I had done nothing wrong, I instantly declined her offer, a decision which seemed to catch her by surprise, and it seemed to cause quite a stir in the police custody-suite at the time, and in the parliamentary session going on at that specific moment in time.
On the day of the arrest, PC 219 Loosely’s body camera evidence of the arrest can be viewed below:
In an effort to be kind to PC 219 Carrie Anne Loosely, I wish to correct her on the last sentence of her second statement as later produced on 4th April 2025.
“I activated my body worn camera N23383, I kept it on for the duration of DC 66 PENALVER’s account, and FARRELL’s subsequent arrest.
When arresting FARRELL I cautioned him, and he made no reply. Once I advised FARRELL of the necessity of the arrest he stated: “okay understood”. Around 2 minutes after the arrest, after the transportation and search procedure was explained to him, FARRELL, he started saying “ONE THING I WOULD SAY, I DON’T RECOGNISE THE SOVEREIGNTY AND JURISDICTION, GIVEN THAT THE ROYAL GIBRALTAR POLICE BREAK OUT THE OLD, however he did not finish speaking, as I advised him that he would get a chance to give his account in interview.”
Actually, I said “GIVEN THAT THE ROYAL GIBRALTAR POLICE BREAK THEIR OATH. I got the distinct impression that Denis, the very likeable police officer from Special Branch heard and understood exactly what I was getting at. Chief Minister Fabian Picardo, not me, was the one they really needed to arrest, if they were ever to be true to their own sworn police oath.
In custody, a police officer who came from Doncaster in South Yorkshire was assigned to interview me. It felt like a nice gesture from the RGP, as they are all too aware of what I stood for, when I was the Principal Intelligence Analyst for South Yorkshire Police, and got myself fired for speaking truth to power and refusing to peddle the lies of former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair. See video of PC 336 HODGSON’s interview.
Final Remarks
The leaflet dropping continues unabated, and a third leaflet has now been delivered to 10,000 households across Gibraltar, entitled “WAR & JUSTICE ARE COMING. ARE YOU READY?”
In the spirit of Project Servator, I recently let the RGP know of my extraordinary on foot “Postman Pat” duties, and it prompted a plain clothes police officer to inform me that the leaflet dropping is scaring the old ladies. Amen, I say to that.
Long Live Any Granny that stands for Truth over Falsehood and pushes back against this TOTAL ONSLAUGHT and MEDICAL TYRANNY.
Could it be what the officer really meant to say instead, was that the leaflets, my board, and my t-shirt warning, are scaring the pants off the Chief Minister and all Picardo’s treasonous cronies? For sure, the contents of the film “Democide On The Rock”, and the insightful leaflets ought to rock Picardo, Picardo’s government and Ramagge Prescott’s wider parliament to the core and scare them all into an act of contrition. Perhaps they should change the opening prayer to ask for mercy and redemption for their dishonourable pathways in following their sacred-cow worship of the Pfizer kill-shots.
* The House of Lords has experienced several notable disruptions over the years, often linked to protests and political activism. Here are a few examples:
Extinction Rebellion Protest (2019) – Climate activists glued themselves to the Speaker’s chair in the Lords chamber, demanding urgent action on climate change. The protest led to temporary adjournment, but no criminal charges were filed.
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill Debate (2022) – The government faced multiple defeats in the Lords over its attempt to clamp down on disruptive protests. Peers rejected measures that would have criminalized noisy demonstrations, reinforcing the Lords’ role in protecting civil liberties.
Brexit Debates (2017-2019) – The Lords chamber saw heated exchanges and public protests during Brexit discussions. Demonstrators gathered outside Parliament, and peers faced intense scrutiny over their role in shaping Brexit legislation.