Every Covid Jab Broke the Law: How the British State (and the Government of Gibraltar) Betrayed the Nuremberg Code and Their Own People
Orginal article by Darren Birks: Editor, Vision News
In 2020, the British Government crossed a line that no democratic state should ever dare to cross: it knowingly broke its own laws, shredded a century of medical ethics, and violated the very code of conduct it helped write after the horrors of Nazi medical experiments — the Nuremberg Code.
Over 87 million doses of Covid-19 vaccines were pushed into British arms under the promise of “saving lives.” But behind this slogan was a cold, calculated suppression of informed consent — a deception so sweeping that not a single dose administered met the basic legal standard of medical ethics. Not one.
The Consent Scam
The NHS’s so-called ‘informed consent’ process was a sham — a PR fig leaf to cover what was effectively medical coercion. The “easy to read” forms handed to millions were stripped of any real information. Recipients were told to expect a sore arm, maybe a headache — but nowhere did these leaflets admit to the real risks: blood clots, myocarditis, Bell’s palsy, blindness, miscarriages, heart failure. (Ref: MHRA Yellow Card Reports).
In law, consent means knowing the risks and freely agreeing to them. But that wasn’t done in 2021 and it hasn’t been done for a simple jab since. The NHS and GHA failed to tell the patient what it was that they were injecting into their arm. It wasn’t a vaccine, it was an experimental
product that hadn’t gone through ANY safety testing whatsoever.
Worse still, millions of this experimental new drug, was injected by volunteers — not doctors, not nurses, but hastily drafted temps with a morning’s ‘training’ — none of which covered informed consent law.
Secret Whistleblowers, Silenced Evidence
One woman — whose father died after his Pfizer injection in January 2021 — filmed the charade at Manchester’s biggest jab hub. The 12-minute undercover video showed the ugly truth: no explanation of risks, no time to ask questions, no patient leaflets, no legal safeguards. Within weeks, that footage vanished from social media, scrubbed under the Orwellian label of ‘misinformation’.
Groups like the UK Medical Freedom Alliance (UKMFA) sounded the alarm. Senior lawyers, doctors, scientists — all shouted that informed consent was being deliberately bypassed.
Anna de Buisseret, senior lawyer and head of Lawyers For Liberty, confirmed NHS vaccinators were trained how to stab arms — but never how to explain risk or uphold the law. When she confronted a senior NHS whistleblower — a surgeon who trains doctors in consent — he checked the official protocols and found nothing but instructions on how to jab. The message was clear: the patient’s right to know did not exist.
The State’s Big Lie
Don’t chalk this up to typical government incompetence. This was systematic suppression. The same officials who barked daily orders from Downing Street podiums — Chris Whitty, Jonathan Van-Tam and their media mouthpieces — never once uttered a word about deaths or disabling injuries from the experimental mRNA shots.
Search every Covid briefing, every radio interview: not one honest mention of blood clots or myocarditis or the lives ruined. Instead, they conspired with Silicon Valley to erase adverse reaction reports, silence whistleblowers, and brand dissent as heresy.
This was not public health — this was propaganda.
Life or Death: Pharmaceutical “Plandemic” Poisonous Vaccines, or the Healing of the Holy Spirit – Your choice. In Paul’s Letter to the Galatians Ch. 5:20 the Greek word Pharmakeia was originally translated into English as witchcraft, to try to hide its true meaning of pharmacy, and likewise Simon the Witch was translated as Simon the Sorcerer/Magician, because he had been using witchcraft/pharmacy to bewitch and deceive people into believing that he was a great healer, just like modern-day pharmacists do.
How long must we suffer O Lord? – Until you return to keeping and enforcing The Law. We have been lovingly WARNING you about these people, and their evil plans, for millennia and more recently locally for years, but have been consistently ignored, and now you and your loved ones are paying the price for ignoring Our warnings.
The Nuremberg Code: Shredded by Its Own Authors
When early critics invoked the Nuremberg Code, the establishment laughed it off. They called it irrelevant, conspiratorial, fringe. But here’s the truth: the UK helped write that code after Nazi doctors were tried for experimenting on humans without consent. The same principles that hanged Nazi physicians were tossed aside when it suited Westminster’s narrative. Read it yourself. Here is the Nuremberg Code in full — judge whether Britain and Gibraltar broke it:
The Ten Points of the Nuremberg Code
- The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
- The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
- The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
- The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
- No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
- The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
- Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
- The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
- During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
- During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
(Source: US National Institutes of Health — Nuremberg Code)
Every single Covid jab delivered in the UK and Gibraltar stands in direct violation of this code and basic English law on informed consent. The fact that the governments and their mouthpieces still dare to dismiss this as conspiracy theory should outrage every thinking citizen.
This was never about health — it was about power, control, and the willing collusion of Big Tech and Big Pharma to rewrite what ‘informed consent’ means until it meant nothing at all.
They gambled with your body. They hid the risks. And they laughed when you asked for the truth.
Millions lined up to roll up their sleeves, trusting a government that tore up the same rules it once helped write to stop crimes against humanity. So ask yourself — if they broke the law then, who will hold them to it now? And when the next ‘crisis’ comes, what new line will they cross — with your body, your rights, your children?
Sources:
UK Yellow Card Adverse Reaction Reports
UK Medical Freedom Alliance
Lawyers For Liberty
Nuremberg Code Original Text
Source: Vision News – Every Covid Jab Broke the Law: How the British State Betrayed the Nuremberg Code and Its Own People